Friday, 1 February 2008
Reflection on Powerpoint Presentation
With our high collaboration spirit and great efforts, we go through the Powerpoint smoothly. Somewhere during our work, the mouse cannot be used. Fortunately, no serious problem comes up. 15 minutes passes so quickly that hardly do we think our task has been completed. Upon reflection, we all feel pleased with what has been done. The class’s contribution to our group is quite positive and constructive. We get them involved in our presentation through their many follow-up questions. For instance, Maria suggests we should not include too many websites in the Webquest and this is really the matter we have given much thought. In response, we explain that 25 Websites are placed in 5 categories, which means each group of students just chooses one kind and work with about 5 sites. We appreciate the whole class’s comments on our presentation. We ourselves also thank all other groups for giving us a good opportunity to learn new things from their well-prepared projects.
If we had more time, we could put more decorations and effects on our Powerpoint. About the topic, so far we think it requires no changes. We will try our best to make the project better and more practical.
Thursday, 31 January 2008
REACHING THE END – ARE WE ON THE RIGHT TRACK? TRY OUR BEST!
Some advanced PowerPoint controls seem enough to start a new busy day bursting with activities. We learn how to interact with the audience thanks to some tabs in the Control Toolbox, which is really interesting. Those who pay attention to the presentation can wholly involve through some communicative tasks like ticking the box or writing the answer on the main screen. Unlike what we have known, a PowerPoint Presentation can be easily managed even when it comes to slide show.
Secondly, Copyright issues which have always been a hot topic are introduced with a lot of warnings from the teacher. It dawns on us that for a long time we have seemed to neglect to cite or give enough reference information. We mistakenly take pictures, videos and texts from the Internet without thinking about copyright or intellectual property. Even though we create something for academic purposes, it is essential to take Copyright matters into consideration. Our group then wonder whether some of our pictures posted on the Blog need to be added the source. Ya, who took them, from which sources, do we still remember? Of course, we will take a look to check this.
Wednesday, 30 January 2008
The Most Interesting Websites
Websites for Teachers:
- Oxford University Press – A great resource for language learners and teachers. We can also search for academic, professional information and materials.
<http://www.oup.com//> - Teaching English - As a co-production between BBC and the British Council, this website provides teachers of English with a practical resource, a theoretical and historical archive as well as a forum for teachers to exchange their thoughts, ideas and materials.
<http://www.teachingenglish.org.uk/ >
Websites for Students:
- British Council – A reliable site of different kinds of interesting activvities and links related to foreign language learning and teaching, which is suitable for leaners at different levels. It includes exercises, songs, quizzes, and so on. <http://www.britishcouncil.org/learnenglish/>
- BBC Learning English - This website enables students to practice their English with a lot of activities like Listening, Crosswords, especially downloadable videos and audios related to interesting and daily topics.
< http://www.bbc.co.uk/worldservice/learningenglish>
More websites will be added soon. ^^
We welcome all your contribution to lengthen this website list.
Hot Potatoes, really interesting!
The Hot Potatoes suite includes six applications, enabling you to create interactive multiple-choice, short-answer, jumbled-sentence, crossword, matching/ordering and gap-fill exercises for the World Wide Web. Hot Potatoes is not freeware, but it is free of charge for those working for publicly-funded non-profit-making educational institutions, who make their pages available on the web. Other users must pay for a licence. Check out the Hot Potatoes licensing terms and pricing on the Half-Baked Software Website.
---- Finally, some lines about our lecturer - Ms. Marta
We would like to send great thanks to you.
Our teacher is so nice, we love to hear her voice and see her smile.
An Exploration Day For Everybody in TILT Class
With clear and detailed instructions of Ms Marta, we have better and deeper understanding of the software so that we can apply them in teaching and learning English. Also, the thing that we are interested in is the way teachers can use well-designed activities for students to do at home and also get students' results via email or saved document. In that way, both teachers and students can make use most of technology in studies even if their schools don't have multimedia rooms or labs. From what we discovered today, our group has a number of ideas for our projects and our lessons in future as well.
Tuesday, 29 January 2008
Webquest Evaluation

These are the strengths and weaknesses that our group have just found in the webquest above.
Monday, 28 January 2008
What is WebQuest?
Question 1: What is WebQuest?
A WebQuest is an inquiry-oriented activity in which some or all of the information that learners interact with comes from resources on the internet, optionally supplemented with videoconferencing.
Question 2: What are the essential components of the WebQuest?
There are six critical components in a WebQuest:
1. Introduction:
Providing background information, motivational scenarios and an overview of the learning goals to students.
2. Task: a formal description of what students will have accomplished by the end of the WebQuest
3. Process:
This is a description of the steps learners should go through in accomplishing the task, with links embedded in each step.
4. Resources:
This section of the WebQuest consists of a list of the resources (bookmarked Web sites, print resources, etc.) that your students will need to complete the task.
5. Evaluation:
Each WebQuest needs a rubric 1 for evaluating students' work. The standards should be fair, clear, consistent, and specific to the tasks set.
6. Conclusion:
This step allows for reflection by the students and summation by the teacher.
Question 3: What do short-term and long-term WebQuest focus?
_ The goal of a short term WebQuest is knowledge acquisition and integration. In 1-3 periods, a learner will achieve a significant amount of new information and manage to understand and use it.
_ The goal of a longer term WebQuest is extending and refining knowledge. In between one week and a month in a classroom setting, a learner would have analyzed a body of knowledge deeply, transformed it in some way, and demonstrated an understanding of the material.
Question 4: What are the benefits of WebQuests?
Using WebQuests in our classrooms can help build a solid foundation that prepares people for the future:
• They will be able to work in teams and move through several careers in a lifetime.
• The issues facing citizens will become more and more complex, and societal problems will resist easy fixes or black-and-white categorization.
• The amount of information will grow at an accelerating pace, directly from a growing number of sources without filtering or verification.
Question 5: How to create WebQuest?
First you need a Web server or if you do not have server space, you can copy your WebQuest onto the hard drive then run it on a browser like Netscape or Internet Explorer. And you have to make sure that your computer access to the Internet. Finally, there are lots of pre-made templates for page design and some content hints to help you build your own quest so you have to think and choose them.
Cited and adapted from
http://webquest.sdsu.edu/about_webquests.html
http://www.thirteen.org/edonline/concept2class/webquests/index_sub5.html
Welcome to Home Sweet Home!
Our group members are:
This is our first posting! Your constructive comments are always welcome!
Criteria to Evaluate Good Websites For Language Learning
1. Language-learning potential
2. Learner fit
3. Practicality
4. How well the site design facilitates student learning
5. The quality of feedback, record keeping, and other management aspects
6. Support for human-human and computer-human interactivity
7. Meaningful and contextualized presentation
8. Content is culturally appropriate
9. Degree of adaptivity to users’ history and preferences
10. Accessibility to persons with physical disabilities